The Three-Fifths Compromise | Perspectives Of Change (2024)

FAQs

The Three-Fifths Compromise | Perspectives Of Change? ›

It determined that three out of every five slaves were counted when determining a state's total population for legislative representation and taxation. Before the Civil War, the Three-Fifths Compromise gave a disproportionate representation of slave states

The Three-Fifths Compromise outlined the process for states to count slaves as part of the population in order to determine representation and taxation for the federal government.

Three-fifths compromise, compromise agreement between delegates from the Northern and the Southern states at the United States Constitutional Convention (1787) that three-fifths of the enslaved population would be counted for determining direct taxation and representation in the House of Representatives.

One particularly controversial issue was the Three Fifths Compromise, which settled how enslaved people would be counted for purposes of representation and taxation.

Three of five equal parts (3/5, ⅗, 0.6).

The Southern states wanted to count the entire slave population. This would increase their number of members of Congress. The Northern delegates and others opposed to slavery wanted to count only free persons, including free blacks in the North and South.

It said that slaves could be counted as 3/5 of a person for both representation and taxation. Also said that international slave trade would not cease (stop) for two decades (until 1808). The federal government was to assist in the return of runaway slaves ("fugitive laborers") throughout the country.

The 3/5 compromise gave the south more representatives in the house and therefore more control over taxes. The south would have liked 5/5 of the slaves counted toward representation giving the south more control over how the taxes would be spent.

The compromise provided for a bicameral legislature, with representation in the House of Representatives according to population and in the Senate by equal numbers for each state.

The Great Compromise settled the method of representation in the legislative branch. Small states wanted equal representation , and large states wanted representation based on population (equality by vote). Under the compromise, all states were represented equally in the Senate. Was this answer helpful?

Which state benefited most from the 3-5ths compromise? ›

Both Delaware and Virginia could be said to have benefited the most when the Compromise was enacted. But beforehand, under the Continental Congress, each state delegation got one vote, so Virginia gained the most relative power with the new Constitution.

Final answer:

The Three-fifths Compromise was an agreement that counted slaves as three-fifths of a person for representation and taxation. However, it was not an effective solution as it perpetuated slavery and created unequal representation in Congress.

Which statement about the Three-Fifths Compromise is accurate? The Three-Fifths Compromise determined where the greatest enslaved populations were based on census data.

Three fifths as a percentage is 60%. To express 3/5 as a percentage, we first divide 3 by 5: 3 / 5 = . 6.

There are 2 halves in a whole. There are 3 thirds in a whole. There are 4 quarters in a whole. There are 5 fifths in a whole.

What is three fifth of 100? 60 is the answer.

Expert-Verified Answer

B. to increase the power of southern states in Congress. Explanation: The 3/5 compromise was the ability to count 3/5th of a state slaves to count as one citizen, which would help make congress more "proportional" & giving the south more power.